> Is None so weird? All I am proposing is a symmetric value to None. > Just like there is a -1 and 1, -Infinity and Infinity, None logically > should have Some. Maybe not so much -Some == None, but as I propose in > the PEP, possibly Some == not None. None's purposr is not to be less than all numbers (in fact in the past it wasn't); it's to be "not any object", like nil or NULL in other languages. I don't see a similar broad role for Some. And I repeat my question: which other language has that concept? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4