Michael Chermside wrote: >>Just an idea... >> >>1. python -p package_name >> >> Equivalent to: >> >> import package_name > > (1) Sourceforge is a great place to request feature enhancements. > Suggestions made on this mailing list is likely to be forgotten > sooner or later. Yes, I know, but the request is not formed yet. :-) > > (2) Can you explain WHY you would want this feature? Is there some > use case? I would prefer NOT to have this, because right now > if I'm reading code and it uses "package_name.someFunction()" > I can scan upward for "package_name" to find out what it's > using. With command line imports, I couldn't do that. So unless > you've got a good reason for it, I personally wouldn't want > this feature. Sorry for description absentees. The main idea is to treating package as a program and run package initialization code from command line. The advantage is zipping all program modules in one zip archive and running the program from command line without unzipping it, like Java's jar's. But this idea need more thoughts however... -- Dmitry Vasiliev (dima at hlabs.spb.ru)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4