A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041315.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocesses

[Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocesses [Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocessesMartin v. Loewis martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Dec 21 21:46:14 EST 2003
Jeff Epler wrote:

> Given all this, does it make sense to adopt a patch similar to the one
> I posted earlier, and ignore the bug in system() on any particular OS?
> system() and popen() are easy to replace in Python if anybody is really
> bothered by the problem.

I'd think so, yes. The patch needs to be elaborated, and I'd delay
integration to wait for a Redhat response. We should also restrict
this for 2.4 at the moment, to find out how other pthread
implementations react to pthread_atfork.

Regards,
Martin


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4