Jeff Epler wrote: > Given all this, does it make sense to adopt a patch similar to the one > I posted earlier, and ignore the bug in system() on any particular OS? > system() and popen() are easy to replace in Python if anybody is really > bothered by the problem. I'd think so, yes. The patch needs to be elaborated, and I'd delay integration to wait for a Redhat response. We should also restrict this for 2.4 at the moment, to find out how other pthread implementations react to pthread_atfork. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4