On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Thanks! Your vote is especially important for me because as far as I > can remember you proposed the scan-up rule for the very first version > of "ni" that we developed together back in 1995! Older and*/*or wiser?-) FWIW, i also proposed using a leading '.' (and a leading '_', when '.' was refused because the parser couldn't handle it) for what we're now calling explict relative imports. Ken klm at zope.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4