> > I cannot accept scan-up as default > > In that case, it's probably better not to have it at all, > and I'd go for your first proposal. One leading dot seems > to stand out pretty well to my eyes -- more is not necessary. But you're okay with two or more dots for extra levels up, right? (Note that this leading-dot algorithm is nearly the same as the old MacOS pathname syntax, except they did it with colons: :foo was foo in the current directory, ::foo was foo in the parent directory, etc., and foo:bar was an absolute pathname. The only difference is that for backwards compatibility reasons they interpreted no colons as relative to the current directory rather than absolute.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4