On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 18:57, Ken Manheimer wrote: > That said, *i* much prefer the leading '.' scheme - i think the > underscores are distinctly *not* easier to read, and i'm not bothered, > anyway, by the "punctuality" of the leading-'.' - i think it stands > out enough to be noticable, and the fractured-path implication of it > conveys the relativeness... Just to continue my contrarian ways, the leading-dot thingie was one of the things that always bugged me about zcml. :) -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4