Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at iinet.net.au>: > A: from __absolute__.dotted.name import foo > B: from __relative__.dotted.name import bar > C: from __heirarchy__.dotted.name import foobar > D: from dotted.name import barfoo > > Then Guido's migration plan would apply to the progression of the D > semantics from the Python 2.3 model to being a shorthand for the > absolute semantics. > > And once _that_ has happened, then we could get rid of the > '__absolute__' version in the name of TOOWTDI. That's where I disagree - I think that type C semantics should be the default/least ugly/easiest to get, not type A. But I wouldn't like any of the others to be as ugly as those, either. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4