>>> "Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)" wrote > > Is funny punctuation really the right way to spell an important > > distinction like this? > > That's what I've been wondering. I really don't like the proposal to use > . in various places to signify relative and absolute imports. It seems > non-obvious both in understandability and readability. I'd have to agree. In the same way that backticks are painful to deal with (they're small and non-obvious), the difference between from foo import bar and from .foo import bar is too small to be pleasant. I also have to wonder about the use case for .. and ... - looking through my code, I can't see anything where using ... rather than a fully qualified name would make the code any more readable. -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4