On 16-dec-03, at 17:16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> Luke replied: >>> capabilities, acls, schmapabilities, same thiiing :) >> >> No... they're not. Read the thread I mentioned above, or read this, >> and some of the other documentation for the language E: >> >> http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/ode/ode-capabilities.html > > no offense intended: i'll read that later, i'm running out of time. > > without going into too many definitions, consider what i am advocating > to be _like_ an access control list but instead to be a capabilities > control list, instead. The distinction between capabilities and ACLs is really important, because they are almost each others opposite. With capabilities you have an (unforgable) right to do something and no-one cares about your identity, with ACLs you have an unforgable identity which is checked against the ACL. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4