Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Would there be any disadvantage to checking for filename.py whenever
> filename is not found so that "super.py" could be invoked with either
> "python super.py" or "python super"?
How about super.pyc? What if both super.pyc and super.py exist but are
not equal in effect? I think the idea is not necesarry. I think most
people have <tab> configured to do commandline completion, so 'python
supe<tab>' would probably achieve the same effect with the same amount
of keystrokes. The disadvantage is, in my opinion, sideways: people get
used to it, and it is not a good habit, because it's called super.py,
not super. I don't like this proposal, I'd give it a -0 in case anyone
is interested.
yours,
Gerrit.
--
202. If any one strike the body of a man higher in rank than he, he
shall receive sixty blows with an ox-whip in public.
-- 1780 BC, Hammurabi, Code of Law
--
Asperger's Syndrome - a personal approach:
http://people.nl.linux.org/~gerrit/english/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4