A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041026.html below:

[Python-Dev] rexec.py unuseable

[Python-Dev] rexec.py unuseable [Python-Dev] rexec.py unuseableSkip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Mon Dec 15 14:40:30 EST 2003
    >> My understanding was that in 2.0 it was also broken, but that
    >> (relatively) recent changes to Python made the breakage easier to
    >> exploit.

    Luke> the issue is [back-tracking to the 2.0 code],

    Luke> were those "breakages" actually features, or were they definitely
    Luke> "breakages"?

Dunno.  Take a look at the 2.3 Whats New:

    http://www.python.org/doc/current/whatsnew/node18.html

Search for "rexec".  I don't know more than that.  It only mentions back as
far as 2.1, so I don't know if rexec could be made to work based upon the
code in 2.0.  Also, check this thread from python-dev:

    http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-January/thread.html#31842

That thread includes some indication of what the problem is and how it got
worse in 2.2 and 2.3.

Skip

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4