On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 12:07, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Actually, if truth be told, I'd love to just ban local imports. I > > understand that might be controversial though <wink>. > > Works for me. :-) Yay! :) > > The next best thing would be to force local imports to use special > > syntax (I was going to say "ugly" :) like what you suggest above, but > > I'm afraid that that might be more disruptive, requiring future imports > > and such. I think having a syntax for spelling global imports can be > > done in a backwards compatible way for 2.4. > > Well, but since you want all imports to be global, it'd be insane to > introduce *new* syntax for global imports, wouldn't it? If we banned relative (a.k.a. local) imports, yes definitely. from __future__ global_imports ? pep-time-ly y'rs, -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4