"Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> writes:
> Guido is basically okay with the idea but thought I should check here
> first to see if anyone has any profound thoughts about unexpected
> implications or perhaps a better way.
Not really, this sounds pretty reasonable. Two thoughts:
1) Man, I hate C. Not news :-)
2) /Might/ it be possible to do this automatically for a few slots?
(i.e. are there any slots that have parameter lists that let the
the tp_foo implementation function just be wrapped up in a METH_O
or METH_NOARGS PyCFunction?). Bit of a hack, mind.
Cheers,
mwh
--
Gullible editorial staff continues to post links to any and all
articles that vaguely criticize Linux in any way.
-- Reason #4 for quitting slashdot today, from
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4