A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/040880.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: a serious threat to 2.3's speed?

[Python-Dev] Re: a serious threat to 2.3's speed? [Python-Dev] Re: a serious threat to 2.3's speed?Alex Martelli aleax at aleax.it
Thu Dec 11 10:40:18 EST 2003
On Thursday 11 December 2003 04:09 pm, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>     >> Another option for a masters thesis Brett - speeding up function
>     >> calls :)
>
>     Fredrik> that would be most excellent.
>
> Indeed.  We should make sure we're comparing apples to apples when looking
> at Jim's benchmark figures though.  It's not clear to me that his current
> system supports all the different types of callables which CPython
> supports. That alone might streamline his function call code a lot.

How so?  Isn't one "indirecting" through the tp_call slot anyway?  Supporting
two or two thousand types of callables should make function calls just about
the same cost -- or am I missing something...?


Alex


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4