A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/040816.html below:

[Python-Dev] are CObjects inherently unsafe?

[Python-Dev] are CObjects inherently unsafe? [Python-Dev] are CObjects inherently unsafe?Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Mon Dec 8 05:02:32 EST 2003
Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> writes:

> Michael Hudson <mwh at python.net>:
>
>> Why a void* then?  That's particularly unassertive.  char* would be
>> better, surely...
>
> A string isn't the only thing that could usefully be used
> as a descriptor.

What else would you consider useful?  I'm only really aware of the
most straightforward uses of CObjects (and wonder if the advanced uses
actually see much use...).

Cheers,
mhw

-- 
  Just point your web browser at http://www.python.org/search/ and
  look for "program", "doesn't", "work", or "my". Whenever you find
  someone else whose program didn't work, don't do what they
  did. Repeat as needed.    -- Tim Peters, on python-help, 16 Jun 1998

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4