A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/040756.html below:

[Python-Dev] source-level backward compatibility requirements

[Python-Dev] source-level backward compatibility requirements [Python-Dev] source-level backward compatibility requirementsFred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake at acm.org
Fri Dec 5 11:22:06 EST 2003
Guido van Rossum writes:
 > I'd rather drop 1.5.2 compatibility for the logging module *as it is
 > in CVS*.  1.5.2 users can continue to use the last version that was
 > distributed by its author independently.

So would I, and this was what I originally proposed (removing the use
of apply() altogether).  There was some objection to this, mostly
based on PEP 291.  It wasn't clear how many people actually cared
about this case, and I don't recall seeing Vinay chime in.

On the other hand, I find I'm not really a fan of deprecating apply()
in the first place, so I can think of other solutions.  ;-)


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4