> From: Arthur > > What is fundamentally wrong with copy(list) as an alternative > to list[:]? Well, it's slower ... it involves a Python function call and python code, whereas list[:] is all C. Of course, I didn't say it's a *lot* slower ... the actual copying is likely to take longer. However, I have to agree that I've almost never used copy or deepcopy. Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4