> I think this is the key thing here. Lambda in its full form is very > flexible and wide ranging - but 90% of the time, this flexibility > isn't needed. And everything pays a cost for that flexibility, even > when it's not used. > > Something that did that 90%, fast and efficiently, while leaving > lambda for the few remaining cases where its flexibility is needed > (possibly with an intent to deprecate it in the future) would probably > be the best option. For the remaining 10%, you could just use 'def' if lambda didn't exist at all. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4