"Raymond Hettinger" <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> writes: > When a test fails, it is accompanied by tracebacks that include > all the processing within the unittest module itself. This makes > it darned difficult to see at a glance what went wrong. If like > me, you use unittest as part of the development process, then you > run it hundreds of times each week and this eyesore gets to be a > real PITA. > > I don't recall when or where, but someone has proposed a fix. > But, like many great ideas, it got stymied because someone, > somewhere has a use for the rest of the traceback. Also, a > developer raised the (IMO red herring) issue -- what if there > is a bug in the unittest module, how would you track it. http://www.python.org/sf/722638 > > So, I would like to re-raise the issue. > Can we get this fixed? Yes, please. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4