RetroSearch Browse

Tue Dec 2 08:27:46 EST 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/040586.html

On Monday 01 December 2003 08:10 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
This pretty much makes PEP 237
> finished except for the complete and utter eradication of the trailing
> 'L' (and probably of the 'long' type altogether) in Python 3.0.

Would there still be an int type and a long type in Python 3.0, or would the 
notion of a long be be dropped. If it were dropped, then the int 
representation would be transparently represented as a long if the size of 
the number could not fit in an int. If long is dropped then the long function 
could be added to the list of builtins that will disappear in Python 3.0.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/040586.html below:

[Python-Dev] Int FutureWarnings and other 2.4 TODOs