> The chaining part, or the idea at all? Sorry, I didn't even see the chaining idea, so it was the keyword attribute instead of two different functions I disliked. The chaining idea seems unnecessary, you can do this with a general currying facility. (I'm not so keen on copying too many such ideas from Zope in to Python -- together they feel more like a bag of clever tricks than like a well-thought-out language.) Anyway, it's all moot -- Raymond just added operator.itemgetter and operator.attrgetter. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4