Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:28 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > Hmmm... that makes me think of tests... I guess I won't really be able >> > to supply a test for the feature, since that would just be testing >> > whether the feature is available. >> >> For interactive stuff like this, absence of unit tests is acceptable. > > pexpect (or rebuilding some of its functionality on top of raw pty) > should allow unit tests of textmode interactive stuff, though -- in > theory, at least. I suspect this approach would find more out about bugs in the pty implementations of old versions of Solaris than anything to do with Python. Cheers, mwh -- ... but I guess there are some things that are so gross you just have to forget, or it'll destroy something within you. perl is the first such thing I have known. -- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4