Brett> After clearing up the confusing issue of the difference between a Brett> Python int and a Python Integer (the former is <type 'int'> while Brett> the latter is the union of <type 'int'> and <type 'long'>), .... Brett> As of right now Python claims that a void pointer can be held in Brett> a Python Integer, but this breaks that claim.... How so? If a Python Integer is the union of int and long, then when sizeof(void *) > sizeof(long), you just spill into Python longs. I didn't follow the discussion closely, but something about what you've said doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Maybe the wording just needs to be clarified. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4