At 22:47 06.08.2003 +0200, Samuele Pedroni wrote: >> > I have just gone through implementing a correct id() for Jython. >> >>It sounds like you haven't been looking hard enough. The Java VM >>certainly has a unique (among "life" objects) identification of >>objects, which likely also fits into a fixed number of bytes. > >Thanks, I did my homework. > >why do you think it certainly have to. It doesn't. btw, I'm amazed how I managed to answer so calmly,next time I won't.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4