Brett writes: > I would appreciate not just correctional feedback but just overall > feedback as well for this summary. I have changed the format once again > as well as the general philosophy behind the Summaries Brett, you're doing great as usual. Saving enough time to survive grad school may have been your primary motivation, but I actually think that this revised format is better than your exhaustive one. IMHO people who wanted to know every detail that went on would just subscribe to python-dev, and people who wanted historical accuracy would just consult the list archives. Your summaries made these tasks easier, but could never be as exhaustive as just reading the list. However, the "more journalistic" approach is really nice because it helps to separate out the relevent from the insignifigant. It is a very useful filtering of the information, providing something you CAN'T get by reading the list. Of course, it's *your* idea of what's important and what's not, but at this point I'd say you're as qualified as any to make that call, and more qualified than almost all. Keep up the great work! -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4