Guido van Rossum <guido at python.net> writes: > Interesting indeed. The focus on bytecode is understandable: let > someone else write a parser, so Parrot won't have to. But from > skimming his log, Dan seems to take the bytecode too seriously; > it's really only meant to be a quick way for the parser to output > something. In particular, bytecode hacks were never a goal. Really? You surprise me <wink>. Cheers, mwh -- 3. Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon. -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4