On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 20:26, Greg Ewing wrote: > I agree. We should *not* try to shoehorn properties into the > function modifier syntax, as the resulting contortions would > be at least as bad as what we have now, and probably worse! Agreed, although I'll point out that properties are only one type of descriptor. I have an application which uses non-data descriptors (i.e. define __get__() only) all over the place, and this syntactic extension would definitely clean that code up. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4