> There's some truth to that. OTOH, until the BDFL declares something > to be an ex-PEP, I don't think BDFL rejection of a PEP means that it > is forever dead -- it just requires substantial revision to > resurrect it. The point of PEPs is to prevent rehashing of old > subjects in the same way, not to prevent new ideas from restarting > discussions. In general, it's better to create a new PEP if you have a new idea. The only reason to revive a rejected PEP would be if the reason for rejecting the specific idea put forth in the PEP becomes invalid. A PEP should propose a specific solution. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4