[Tim Delaney] > One I had in mind would be the CALL_ATTR patch, which Guido > explicitly mentioned as having been implemented on the main > path, not on the optimised path, and pointed out that if it > had been implemented only on the optimised path a number of > issues with it would have been discovered much earlier. Correction: I meant to say that about the optimization of expressions of the form '-' NUMBER # e.g. -1 This was buggy for years. I'm not aware of problems with CALL_ATTR (which exists only as a patch on SF) except that it's not always a speedup. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4