Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote: > Was doing some thinking in the shower this morning, and came up with some ideas for specifying optimisation. These are currently quite nebulous thoughts ... > > We have the current situation: > > -O only removes asserts > -OO removes asserts and docstrings. That's true, but not what they actually mean: -O ... optimize the byte code without changing semantics -OO ... optimize even further, slight changes in semantics are allowed (note that some tools rely on the availabilitiy of doc-strings) Rather than adding more options, we should rather think about more optimizations to add ;-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Software directly from the Source (#1, Apr 29 2003) >>> Python/Zope Products & Consulting ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ EuroPython 2003, Charleroi, Belgium: 56 days left
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4