At 12:11 PM 4/26/03 -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I was going over the PEP index this morning, and I noticed a large number > > of PEPs listed under the "open" list that would seem to me to be > > "accepted", if not "done" in some cases, according to the criteria > > described by the headings. (Specifically, PEPs 218, 237, 273, 282, 283, > > 301, 302, 305, and 307.) > >Some of those (e.g. 237) have multiple stages and ought to remain open >until the last stage is implemented. 283 ought to remain open until >Python 2.3 final is released. Some others need to be brought in line >with what ended up being implemented. Authors with commit privileges >can update their own PEPs; others can send patches or new versions to >the PEP editors. The PEP list has an additional heading called "Accepted"; currently only 252 and 253 are in that category. I would've thought that the ones like 237 and 283 that are not "Done" but are definitely "accepted" would go under that "Accepted" heading. It's not a big deal, but it's very hard to see from the list which things are "in progress", "need revisions", or are "unlikely to make it". So since I already took the trouble to work out the answers for myself, I thought I'd offer to help the next person who came along. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4