On Thursday 24 April 2003 12:50 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Agreed. How about naming it os.walk()? I think it's not OS specific > -- all the OS specific stuff is part of os.path. So we only need one > implementation. It's a minor quibble to be sure, but os.walk doesn't really describe what exactly it's doing. I'd suggest os.pathwalk, but that'd be too error-prone, being os.path.walk without a dot. Perhaps os.pathwalker? Just a (likely ill-informed :)) opinion :) Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4