On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 02:42, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > That's really optimistic. Every CD vendor, mirror site, etc. in the > world hosting the Python distribution would have to go through the > business of evaluating whether it's legal to distribute Python or not > in their particular case. I haven't had time to follow this thread closely, but I think I saw a message from Martin where he explained that the OpenSSL wrapper we already have is probably covered by US export regulations. I think it's a matter of interpretation, but I agree with that interpretation. So everyone who distributes Python already needs to do that analysis. I think it's unlikely we would remove the crypto code we already have, so I'm all for adding more crypto code that makes the library more useful. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4