A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-April/035036.html below:

[Python-Dev] When is it okay to ``cvs remove``?

[Python-Dev] When is it okay to ``cvs remove``? [Python-Dev] When is it okay to ``cvs remove``?Martin v. Löwis martin@v.loewis.de
25 Apr 2003 07:06:01 +0200
Tim Peters <tim.one@comcast.net> writes:

> That part I didn't grok:  why force an artifical version number?  I can't
> imagine a use for that.  The "Rewrote from scratch." checkin comment Brett
> will surely make is milestone enough in the CVS log.

Bumping the major number makes a more visible change. There is no
technical reason to do that, nor one to avoid doing so if you like the
visible change.

A number of files in the Python CVS do have a 2.x version number; I
always wondered why that is.

Regards,
Martin




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4