On Thursday 24 April 2003 04:33 pm, Gary Herron wrote: > There's a bit more to this problem. It has to do with the *sre* test > versus the *re* tests. When test_sre is run, it claims to run all its > own tests as well as all of test_re. However any failed tests in > test_re are not reported by test_sre. (Neither the one found by Tim > nor any others I just purposely introduced into test_re.) This is > clearly a problem with test_sre. Only if you run test_re directly > rather than through test_sre do you see Tim's error. Sigh... I find I was confused and must correct that last paragraph... Test test_sre imports re_test not test_re, and test_re also imports re_test -- perhaps you'll understand my confusion. Running test_sre should *not* find Tim's bug, but running test_re should. Test_sre has no problem, test_re needs to be fixed, and re_test, used by both, is fine. Sigh... Gary Herron
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4