On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 21:35, Greg Ward wrote: > On 21 April 2003, Tim Peters said: > > filter() is hard to get rid of because the bizarre filter(None, seq) special > > case is supernaturally fast. Indeed, time the above against > > Hmmm, a random idea: has filter() ever been used for anything else? > I didn't think so. So why not remove everything *except* that handy > special-case: ie. in 3.0, filter(seq) == filter(None, seq) today, and > that's *all* filter() does. I've never used it for anything else, but I'm also just as happy to use [x for x in seq if x] Although it's a bit verbose, TOOWTDI. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4