[Mark Hammond] > Actually, some guidance would be nice here. It's easy this time. BTW, I agree your new check is the right thing to do! If another case like this pops up, though, we/you should probably add a section to the PEP explaining what to do about it. > Is this code (_bsddb.c) ever expected to again build under pre-trunk > versions of Python, or can I remove the old thread-state management code? The former: the pybsddb project still exists and is used with older versions of Python. Barry mumbled something today at the office about wanting to keep the C code in synch. > ie, should my changes be or the style: > > #if defined(NEW_PYGILSTATE_API_EXISTS) > // new 1 line of code > #else > // existing many lines of code > #endif Yes, that would be great.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4