Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> writes:
> OTOH, I wouldn't object too strenuously to a join() builtin, but I'd
> probably never use it -- I'm sure I'd rarely remember the argument order
> and hate having too look it up much more than writing out the current
> spelling. Admit it: there is no natural unforgetable order! :)
It occurs to me that one may put
join = str.join
at the top of one's module, and thereafter use
join('str', sequence)
(For 2.1 backward compatibility, use type('') instead of str.)
Possibly this is a counterargument to accusations that a join builtin
would be bloat, since the same implementation could be used for both.
zw
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4