> Guido van Rossum wrote: > > But if I had to do it over again, I wouldn't have added walk() in the > > current form. > > I think it's the perfect place for a generator. Absolutely! So let's try to write something new based on generators, make it flexible enough so that it can handle pre-order or post-order visits, and then phase out os.walk(). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4