[Tim] > Some questions occurred while reading the PEP again, > primarily are there any To save space, the answer to all your questions are "it is ok", and "it must avoid using the same handle - it must use its own". I have updated the PEP and the patch (primarily in the comments for the new functions) to hopefully clarify this. > > The only issue is the name of the API. > > If that's the only issue, check it in yesterday <0.9 wink>. OK, I'm gunna hold that against you <wink> Guido: > How about PyGILState_Ensure() and PyGILState_Restore()? Done! I have checked in a new pep-311, and a new patch (http://www.python.org/sf/684256). So if Guido can formally pronounce on pep-311, I will use those words against Tim and check it in! Thanks, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4