On vrijdag, apr 18, 2003, at 01:14 Europe/Amsterdam, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I'll back out the change to 'h', which is the only incompatible change > I can see (unless you consider accepting *more* than before an error). > Thomas made no changes to 'l', so I'm not sure what that is about -- > maybe the problem is with unsigned hex constants? Okay, great!! Is this a temporary measure, i.e. is the semantic change to 'h' going to come back after 2.3 is out? -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4