On vrijdag, apr 18, 2003, at 01:14 Europe/Amsterdam, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>>> Maybe we should retract the changes to existing format codes that >>>> make >>>> them more restrictive? That should revive any code that's curerntly >>>> dead, right? >>> >>> That would be much better. if "l" (lower case ell) would continue to >>> accept anything I wouldn't have to change anything. >> >> Guido has also suggested to keep another code without changes, I >> cannot >> remember which one it was, but there is a comment on SF. > > That was 'h'. Right, 'h' turns out to be the problem. I changed a lot of 'l's to 'k's, but it seems this one is the real killer. -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4