On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:36:17AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Nope. I was just tossing out an idea based on my growing frustration with > SF's poor performance. I see the abysmal CVS performance Tim referred to > and also find the bug tracker performance to be problematic (web access, > submissions and updates are often very slow and sometimes fail, forcing me > to sit around waiting for them to complete and then going back to check that > my submission/change actually worked). ... Not to mention file uploads that don't actually upload, erroneous error messages when posting patches and/or bugs, and an inability to map bugs to patches as a built in feature. -c -- 10:10am up 176 days, 1:08, 4 users, load average: 1.18, 1.40, 1.62
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4