On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 01:24, Martin v. L=F6wis wrote: > It is probably possible to find somebody to host the Python CVS and > offer enough connectivity to give more performant service than > SF. However, there is more to hosting such a service: You need user > management, email notifications, backups, and occasional hand-editing > of the CVS repository.=20 This would actually be a big advantage over the present situation. CVS repository surgery is (sadly) necessary sometimes, but it's something we currently can't do without a lot of pain. > I would expect that it might consume > significant time (several hours a week) to host the Python CVS. (Time > per project reduces if you host several projects) I can think of at least 3 projects we could host. :). But even if GForge was our panacea, it would still take a real commitment to run and maintain. I suspect the current crop of volunteers is already stretched pretty far. OTOH, if we could roll Zope into the mix, we'd have more resources to draw from, maybe. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4