[Tim] >> could become the simpler and faster [martin@v.loewis.de] > How much faster, Won't know until it's tried. > and for what example? Code that spends signficant time in tp_traverse, presumably. > Beautiful is better than ugly. Whish is another reason <wink> it would be nice to get rid of the endlessly repeated masses of ugly if (err) return err; incantations out of the many tp_traverse slots, in return for putting a little bit of setjmp/longjmp ugliness in exactly four functions hiding in a single module.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4