"Shane Holloway (IEEE)" <shane.holloway@ieee.org> writes: > So, after all that, I looked in standard library header file for > process.h and found function prototypes for the various _spawn > functions. Would it make sense to add support for "spawnvp" and > "spawnvpe" to posixmodule.c? Should it be guarded by the existing > HAVE_SPAWNV, new HAVE_SPAWNVP, or by MS_WINDOWS definitions? Adding a HAVE_SPAWNVP would be most appropriate, IMO. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4