On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:51:26AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I didn't even know this, and I think it's bad style to use something >that obscure Perhaps... It's also bad style to break the obscure cases that are defined by the specifications... ;-) >(most people would probably guess that 127.1 means >0.0.127.1 or 127.1.0.0). Yeah, unfortunately it's one of those cases that it doesn't really make sense until you actually know the padding happens, and then think about it... It really only makes sense to pad within the address because you are rarely going to have leading or trailing 0s in a network address. So, it pads before the trailing specified octet: 10.1 => 10.0.0.1 10.9.1 => 10.9.0.1 >But since you seem to know about this stuff, perhaps you can submit a >patch? I've updated my local CVS repository, I'll see if I can get a change done on the airplane today. Sean -- The structure of a system reflects the structure of the organization that built it. -- Richard E. Fairley Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo@tummy.com> tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, Python, SysAdmin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4