--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It occurred to me this afternoon (after answering aquestion about creating file objects from file descriptors) that perhaps os.fdopen would be more logically placed someplace else - of course it could also remain as os.fdopen() for whatever deprecation period is warrented. Perhaps as a class method of the file type, file.fromfd()? Should I file a feature request for this on sf, or would it be considered too much of a mindless twiddle to bother with? Jp --=20 http://catandgirl.com/view.cgi?44 --=20 up 16 days, 16:00, 5 users, load average: 1.13, 0.93, 0.85 --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+jzADedcO2BJA+4YRApeUAJ98bFbiUoBXXdzYm025xmV8LamPbwCcDs/J C1oeDLOPgcWgAWwEDQGCGOg= =qSMA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4