>>>>> "MH" == Michael Hudson <mwh@python.net> writes: MH> I'm tempted to just dump the trunk's version of httplib.py onto MH> the release branch. Poring over logs reveals that nearly every MH> checkin is marked as a bugfix candidate (occasionally with a MH> question mark). MH> Certainly it seems ot would be easier to work the checkins that MH> aren't bugfixes out of the trunk than work those that are into MH> the branch, if you see what I mean. MH> But I've never used httplib, so I thought I should ask here MH> first (and Cc: the people responsible for most of the changes). MH> Comments? I think it makes sense to make httplib identical. The changes to httplib have all been intended to make it more robust. My one worry is that a set of changes I made may have broken pipelined https requests in order to fix a different set of bugs. I had intended to check whether pipelined https requests actually worked in 2.2.1. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4