Roeland Rengelink <rengelin@strw.leidenuniv.nl> writes: > 5. This is clearly a profound and interesting bug, but solving this > seems to involve cans of worms, ten-foot poles, and a re-write of the > core. To me, it sounds like this. This has been changed forth and back, and in every state, somebody is unhappy. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4